BJD to review panchayat poll reverses

Bhubaneswar: The ruling BJD today said it would review its poor performance in the ongoing three-tier panchayat election in some districts of Odisha, although its overall show was better than rivals.

“We will certainly review the poor performance of the party in certain districts. Anyway, the BJD is still ahead of its rivals,” BJD vice-president and spokesman S N Patro said after trends of the panchayat polls were known.

Though the State Election Commission (SEC), Odisha, was yet to formally announce results of the panchayat polls, the parties in fray claimed victories after assessing information collected by polling agents at the counting booths.

“The SEC will announce results of the panchayat polls after completion of polling in all the five phases after February 21,” commissioner Rabinarayan Senapati said.

In the previous panchayt polls held for 854 Zilla Parishad seats in 2012, the ruling BJD had captured 654 seats followed by Congress with 128 seats and just 36 seats for BJP.

The CPI had two seats while CPI(M) candidate could win in one ZP seat. JMM had bagged 11 seats while independents won in 22 ZP seats in 2012 panchayat polls.

However, the trend received from the two phases of the five-phase panchayat polls indicated that BJD had already lost about 86 seats. The party headed by Naveen Patnaik had in 2012 captured 290 out of 363 ZP seats in first and second phase. This time round, trend, however said that the BJD got only 204 seats, sources said.

Also Read: BJP’s surge is like ‘Dengue,’ needs timely treatment: BJD
As per the trend, te opposition BJP, on the other hand, secured nearly 121 seats in two phases against only 12 ZP seats in 2012.

Similarly, the trend indicated that Congress nominees could win in only 25 seats in the 2017 polls against 47 seats in 2012 polls.

The loss of about 86 ZP seats by two phases, has become a topic of discussion in the ruling BJD with party vice-president and Excise Minister Damador Rout suspecting sabotage befind the party’s poor performances.

}