Army Chief drags govt to SC on age issue

New Delhi: Army Chief Gen V K Singh today took the unprecedented step of dragging the government to the Supreme Court before which he has challenged its decision over his date of birth that will mean that he retires in May next. Making it an issue of his "honour and integrity", Gen Singh filed a writ petition in the apex court after exhausting all statutory options within the Defence Ministry which had recently rejected his contention that he was born in 1951 and not 1950.

The petition challenges the July 21, 2011 order of the Defence Ministry which fixed the date of birth as May 10, 1950 and the December 30,2011 decision by which his statutory complaint was rejected. He has sought a direction for declaring May 10,1951 as the correct date of birth. The General`s action is without parallel in the history of India`s defence forces and is bound to cause acute embarrassment to the government besides raising concerns about the relationship between civilian authority and the Services.

There was speculation on whether the Army Chief would step down or proceed on leave as the Supreme Court deals with his petition, but there was no indication to this effect. Gen Singh is believed to have stated in his voluminous petition that the issue was not about his tenure but that of his integrity as head of the 13-lakh strong army.

The legal challenge marks the culmination of a simmering row between the General and the Defence Ministry arising out of two different dates of birth in the Army`s files. On the basis of his matriculation certificate and other documents, Gen Singh`s date of birth is May 10,1951 and was accepted by the Ministry for most of his service. However, another document in the shape of his UPSC entrance form filled for NDA course shows the date as May 10, 1950. This is said to have emerged in 2006 since when the matter has been pending.

The petition, filed by counsel Punit Bali, has contended that for 36 years, the army had accepted 1951 as his year of birth and he had got promotions on that basis. He questioned why the government wants to change the date of birth now. The General is believed to have pointed out that the Supreme Court had ruled that the matriculation certificate was an authentic proof of date of birth in service matters.