Money flow into financial savings increased post note ban: Viral Acharya
New Delhi: Post demonetisation, there has been a visible channelising of money towards financial assets like insurance and mutual funds, Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Deputy Governor Viral Acharya said on Saturday.
“It will take us many years to understand the outcome of demonetisation. I sense that in financial assets, something has changed as black money transactions are now not easy,” Acharya said at the Delhi Economics Conclave 2017 here organised by the Finance Ministry.
“Insurance premium collection is on rise since November. If it continues, it will change the valuation of financial assets,” he said.
There has been a non-linear shift since November-December last year, the Deputy Governor noted.
Bond holding is not attractive for tax evasion, he said.
According to Acharya, people earlier a very clear intention to invest black money in real estate and gold.
He said it would take many years to understand the real outcome of the November 8, 2016 demonitisation.
However, former IMF chief economist Kenneth Rogoff, who is presently at the Harvard University, pointed out that demonetisation was flawed in that it phased out high denomination notes overnight.
“Indian demonetisaion was flawed in some respect. My book, ‘The Curse of Cash’, argues for taking five-seven years to phase out big bills. India did this almost overnight,” he said.
Few people realise that it takes six months to one year to print a new currency supply due to technical difficulties in producing counterfeit resistant currency.
India’s biggest problem was that it did not have nearly enough new notes in hand to exchange the old ones, Rogoff said.
“My recommendation is to very gradually over 5-7 years eliminate large denomination notes. It is important to move slowly, so to avoid collateral damage,” he said.
He argued that some countries had approached demonetisation in a better way like Europe phasing of 500 euro notes, Singapore’s discontinuation of $10,000 notes and Australia on discontinuing $100.
However, the Harvard professor said it will take years to judge the full impact of India’s demonetisation move in accelerating electronic payments and the larger picture is that the government has done much to promote financial inclusion.
“The basic idea is to make it more difficult for people to carry out large scale transactions in cash for purposes of crime and tax evasion. The case for limiting use of cash is not a moral question but one of regulatory balance. It is important to be able to retain cash for privacy. The question is scale,” he said.
“Indian demonetisation might yield long-run benefits but also shows things to avoid,” he added.
Supporting government’s Aadhaar initiative, Rogoff said that in advanced economies, mandatory biometrics, identification is not likely given concerns about privacy.