"Our batting flopped in both the innings. We have to show more consistency," Dhoni told the reporters at the post-match media conference. India could manage only 282 and 169 in the two innings.
"We had a decent start in the first innings. We needed to capitalize on it. When the day began, if we could have got them down to 240-250 runs, it was gettable. Even 292, we should have achieved as the wicket was good. There wasn`t much wear and tear on the surface," a disappointed captain remarked.
"In the first innings, we had a good stand going and their bowlers were also a bit tired. So if we could have seen off another 20 overs with the new ball, it would have become easy to score runs. Once a bowler gets tired, he can`t bowl with the same pace and consistency."
To discerners, Sachin Tendulkar`s dismissal on the second evening when he was on 73, was the decisive moment of the game.
"Towards the close of play, everyone wants to be at the non-striker`s end. It happens to everyone. That`s why you have the concept of a nightwatchman in cricket. But if a bowler bowls a gem of a delivery to get you out, you just have got to accept it."
Gautam Gambhir (3& 13) and Virat Kohli (11 & 0) were two batsmen who clearly looked uncomfortable against the pace and bounce of the Australian tracks. But the skipper backed both players and said that he is not concerned with their form. Incidentally, it`s now close to two years that Gambhir has got a Test century.
"Gambhir`s is not a major problem. He`s batting really well in the nets. He just needs to take that extra step and take the same form into the middle. Once you play 30-40 deliveries as an opener, everything is sorted out.
"As for Kohli, he is someone who has been doing well for us. If you want to rely on statistics you can prove every batsman is good and every batsman is bad. We would`ve to wait for him."
Well as Australia bowled, Dhoni wasn`t averse to give credit to Australia`s pace trio of James Pattinson, Peter Siddle and Ben Hilfenhaus. "It wasn`t the batsmen alone who made mistakes. The deliveries were good too. They were too close to the off-stump; some came in, some held their line. Session after session they bowled in the same area. After sometime, you do commit an error."
The skipper though vehemently denied that it was often the intimidatory tactics of Australian fast bowlers which caught his batsmen napping. "If you see the wicket, it wasn`t an ideal one. It had a spongy bounce, the short deliveries were not coming at fast pace. They bowled nagging line, their line and length were both very good, it wasn`t the short stuff which had us worried."
A moment in the game was three consecutive bouncers which James Pattinson bowled at Zaheer Khan on the fourth evening.
Dhoni confirmed that umpire Ian Gould did warn the bowler about the intimidatory tactics. "He (Pattinson) was warned by umpire. The umpire approached us because he wanted fielders and us to be kept away. It was handled in a good way. He wanted to make sure that we all are moving in the right direction."
Dhoni though was clearly perked up by the performance of his bowlers who were able to take 20 wickets without conceding too many runs in the match. "The bowlers did their job in this particular Test. We didn`t start really well, but then we got quick wickets and put pressure on the opposition. Bowlers did their job, it just that we need to post runs on the board.
"I look at positives. Big positive is you need to take 20 wickets and we could do it here. The oppsosition got the scores which we could`ve managed if we had batted well."
Indian skipper defended his decision to give new ball to Umesh Yadav ahead of experienced Ishant Sharma in the second innings, a decision which was vindicated when the young fast bowler took three early wickets.
"We didn`t start with Ishant because Umesh is a swing bowler while Ishant is back-of-length bowler. We needed someone, who could use the second new ball well and that`s the reason we began with Ishant. Overall, I felt Ishant bowled very well, he was beating the bat but sometimes you don`t get the edge."
Australia added 61 runs this morning after having resumed at 179 for 8. It wasn`t much different to the first innings when India had Australia down to 214 for 6, yet they went on to make 333 runs. "It hasn`t deflated us. But we need to keep an eye on.
Even in the first innings, their lower order put on decent runs. If you look at two innings, the final two wickets put on nearly 100 runs."