Samantha Ruth Prabhu
Reports of the recently divorced popular YouTuber-Choreographer Dhanashree Verma taking Rs 4.75 crore alimony from ex-husband and cricketer Yuzvendra Chahal has sparked a debate on dowry vs alimony.
While dowry is often criticized for its exploitative nature, alimony, in some instances, can appear to function similarly. The notion that women are entitled to financial support after divorce, even if they are self-reliant has now become a topic of discussion after Verma and Chahal’s incident.
Fans are taking to social media to call upon society to reconsider the balance between fairness, equality, and the true definition of independence for women in contemporary relationships.
Popular actress Samantha Ruth Prabhu, who was previously married to Naga Chaitanya, son of Nagarjuna, one of the richest actor’s in south, is being hailed on social media for allegedly rejecting a whopping Rs 200 crore alimony.
Despite a bad separation, Samantha reportedly rejected Rs 200 crore alimony, exemplifying the true definition of an Independent, self-reliant woman.
The actress, widely respected for her independence and success, made a statement that stands in contrast to Dhanashree Verma. Despite her career as a YouTuber, choreographer, music video star, and even a practicing dentist, Verma reportedly accepted Rs 4.75 crore alimony after her divorce. This has raised questions about the rationale behind alimony for women who are financially independent.
While Samantha’s decision is being hailed as a progressive step toward gender equality, the situation has also sparked unease among many men who see alimony as a potential financial threat, especially when women are already financially self-sufficient.
This has ignited fears of a system that might exploit traditional gender roles, with men being held financially accountable for women’s choices post-divorce, even when they can stand on their own two feet.
Dhanashree and Chahal are yet to issue any public statement regarding their divorce and the subsequent alimony.