Pant exits from Manchester Test due to injury? here’s what ICC rule says on his batting substitute? 

Rishabh Pant’s woeful injury the ongoing Manchester Test has reignited debate over ICC’s substitution rules. The Indian wicketkeeper-batter was struck on the toe by a fierce delivery from Chris Woakes while attempting a reverse scoop on Day 1. After receiving on-field treatment, Pant retired hurt on 37 off 48 balls, a knock that included two fours and a six and was later taken off in an ambulance.

With India at 309/5, and Shardul Thakur on 39 and Washington Sundar on 14, concerns mounted about India’s depth without Pant.

ICC Rule Under Scrutiny

According to Section 24.1.2 of the ICC Playing Conditions, a substitute is not allowed to bat, bowl, or captain, but can keep wickets with umpire approval in case of genuine injury or illness. Though the MCC amended the rule in 2017 to allow substitute wicketkeepers with umpire consent, batting remains strictly prohibited.

If Dhruv Jurel replaces Pant, he’ll be permitted to keep wickets but won’t be allowed to bat, a rule that has divided opinions.

Parthiv Patel: “I’m Okay With the Rule”

Former India wicketkeeper Parthiv Patel backed the ICC's stand.

“There are already grey areas being exploited — like the concussion sub in T20s,” he said. “Earlier, even replacing a keeper wasn’t allowed. Now at least, a keeper can be replaced with another.” Patel said while replying to India Today.

Calling Pant’s injury unfortunate, Patel added, “It is what it is. What can you do? The rule seems fair.”

Rulebook vs. Reality

As India continues their innings in Manchester, questions remain over whether the ICC should revisit substitution policies for scenarios like Pant’s. But for now, fair play trumps flexibility, even in critical moments.