Defence Ministry Approves Procurement Of 72,000 Assault Rifles
New Delhi: The Union Defence Ministry has approved a proposal to purchase 72,000 Sig Sauer assault rifles from the US at a cost of around Rs 780 crore.
The Defence Acquisition Council led by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh on Monday approved proposals for capital acquisition of various equipment required by the Indian armed forces at an approximate cost of Rs 2,290 crore.
These include procurement from the domestic industry as well as foreign vendors.
To equip the frontline troops of the Army, the council has accorded approval for the procurement of 72,000 Sig Sauer assault rifles at a cost of around Rs 780 crore.
Under the ‘Buy Indian’ category, the council has approved the procurement of Static HF Tans-receiver sets and smart anti-airfield weapons. The HF radio sets will enable seamless communication for the field units of the Army and the Air Force. They are being procured at a cost of Rs 540 crore.
The smart anti-airfield weapons being procured at cost of Rs 970 crore will add to the fire power of the Navy and the Air Force.
Earlier, the Indian Army had received the first lot of Sig Sauer assault rifles to boost its counter-terrorism operations. India had acquired the rifles under the fast-track procurement programme.
The new rifles will replace the existing Indian small arms system (Insas) 5.56×45 mm rifles used by the forces and manufactured locally by the Ordnance Factories Board.
India does away with offset policy in Rafale-like deals
India has done away with the offset clause in government-to-government, inter-government and single vendor defence deals, a week after the country’s auditor pulled up French defence giant Dassault for not meeting its contractual obligation to reinvest in India after the sale of 36 Rafale fighter aircraft to the Indian Air Force.
Apurva Chandra, Special Secretary and Director General (Acquisition) said, “We have made changes in offset guidelines. From now on, there would be no offset clause in government-to-government, inter-government and single vendor defence deals.”
While speaking after unveiling of new Defence Acquisition Procedure (DAP) 2020 in New Delhi, Chandra said that in other deals there would be offset policy. He said that as per revision in offset guidelines the preference would be given to manufacture of complete defence products over components and various multipliers have been added to give incentivisation in discharge of offsets.
On September 23, India’s federal auditor pulled up Rafale-maker Dassault and its weapons producer for not fulfilling their offset commitment to transfer technology to India as part of the 2016 contract for 36 combat jets.
The country’s financial watchdog Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) in an audit report on Management of Defence Offsets tabled in Parliament flagged that foreign vendors made various offset commitments to qualify for the main supply contract but later were not earnest about fulfilling these commitments.
The report stated, “..in the offset contract relating to 36 Medium Multi Role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA), the vendors M/s Dassault Aviation and M/s MBDA initially proposed (September 2015) to discharge 30 per cent of their offset obligation by offering high technology to DRDO.”
DRDO wanted to obtain Technical Assistance for the indigenous development of engine (Kaveri) for the Light Combat Aircraft.
“Till date the vendor has not confirmed the transfer of this technology,” the CAG stated in the report.
India has procured 36 Rafale combat aircraft from Dassault Aviation in a government-to-government contract. Rafale is a 4.5 generation aircraft and has latest weapons, superior sensors and fully integrated architecture. It is also an omni-role aircraft which means it can carry out at least four missions in one sortie.
In 2005, India adopted the Offset Policy for defence capital purchases. This meant that for all capital purchases above Rs 300 crore made through imports, the foreign vendor was required to invest at least 30 per cent of the value of the purchase in India. This investment was to be made in the Indian defence and aerospace sector. Various avenues were available to the vendor to discharge these offset obligations.
This included Foreign Direct Investment, offering of free Transfer of Technology to Indian firms, purchase of eligible products manufactured by Indian firms (exports). For the discharge of these offsets the foreign vendor had to select an Indian firm as a partner (Indian Offsets Partner or IOPs).
The objective of the Offset policy was to develop the Indian defence industry so as to achieve self-reliance and reduce dependence on imports.
From 2005 till March 2018, 46 offset contracts had been signed with foreign vendors, valued at Rs 66,427 crore.
“Under these contracts, by December 2018, Rs 19,223 crore worth of offsets should have been discharged by the vendors. However, the offsets claimed to have been discharged by them was only Rs 11,396 crore, which was only 59 per cent of the commitment,” CAG stated.
Further, only 48 per cent (Rs 5,457 crore) of these offset claims submitted by the vendors were accepted by the ministry.
The rest were largely rejected as they were not compliant to the contractual conditions and the Defence Procurement Procedure, the auditor flagged.