Entry 41 & the tussle for power over 'Services' in Delhi 

The Constitution Bench had observed that an unaccountable and non-responsive civil service may pose a serious problem of governance in a democracy. 

Aarvind Kejriwal

When the Indian Constitution was adopted, Delhi was a Part C State and was governed by the Government of Part C States Act, 1951. The Act provided for a Council of Ministers and a legislature for Delhi with the power of making laws on matters enumerated in the State List or the Concurrent List except on subjects that were expressly excluded. The Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act 1956 introduced States and Union Territories. Union Territories were to be administered by the President through Administrator. In 1962, Article 239A was inserted in the Constitution and provided for the creation of local legislatures or a Council of Ministers or both for certain Union Territories. Article 239A created a separate category of Union Territories since all Union Territories were no longer envisaged to be administered only by the President. The introduction of Article 239A was followed by the Government of Union Territories Act 1963. Union Territory of Puducherry is administered by this enactment. By the Constitution (Sixty-ninth Amendment) Act 1991, Article 239AA was inserted in the Constitution, and National Capital Territory of Delhi (NCTD) became the only Union Territory with the special status of having a constitutionally created Legislature and Council of Ministers. 

Recently, the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court held that the Legislative Assembly of the National Capital Territory of Delhi (NCTD) has competence over entries in List II and List III except for the expressly excluded entries of List II; the executive power of NCTD is co-extensive with its legislative power; the Union of India has executive power only over the three entries in List II over which NCTD does not have legislative competence. The Constitution Bench also held that the phrase ‘insofar as any such matter is applicable to Union Territories’ in Article 239AA(3) cannot be read to further exclude the legislative power of NCTD over entries in the State List or Concurrent List, over and above those subjects which have been expressly excluded. The Constitution Bench also held that NCTD has legislative and executive power over “Services”, that is, Entry 41 of List II of the Seventh Schedule.