TV
The Shree Jagannath Temple Administration (SJTA) in Puri has formally sought an explanation from the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) after a series of sensitive photographs from within the Puri temple premises, including the inner sanctum, were uploaded to its social media, triggering widespread backlash from devotees and religious stakeholders.
The controversy stems from the ASI’s decision to post high-resolution images showcasing the recently renovated Ratna Bhandar (treasury), Bhog Mandap entrance, Satpahacha steps, and Ghanti Dwara.
These photographs, taken inside the temple’s highly restricted zones, were uploaded on official ASI channels as part of a celebratory post marking the completion of a 95-day structural restoration project.
Violations Spark Outrage Among Devotees
The visuals posted by ASI clearly displayed the interior layout of the sacred temple, despite a strict ban on mobile phones and cameras within its premises under existing temple security guidelines.
Even servitors are barred from carrying phones into the sanctum. The release of such imagery without proper protocol has now raised serious questions about procedural lapses by the agency tasked with preserving the monument’s heritage.
Although ASI deleted the images shortly after the uproar, screenshots had already gone viral, leading to sharp criticism from devotees, temple servitors, and cultural watchdogs. Critics called the move a breach of religious trust and temple sanctity.
SJTA Reacts, Demands Accountability
In response, SJTA Chief Administrator Arvind Padhee wrote a letter to ASI, expressing concern over the violation of spiritual norms and demanding accountability.
The letter emphasised that the spiritual sanctity and sacred atmosphere of the 12th-century temple must always be preserved and that casual dissemination of internal visuals undermines public faith and religious sentiment.
Padhee also reminded ASI that such actions could deeply offend devotees and urged the institution to exercise greater discretion in future communications. The matter was promptly brought to the attention of ASI’s Director General.
Restoration Success Overshadowed by Breach
Ironically, the controversial photographs were originally meant to highlight the successful completion of a major restoration effort at the Srimandir.
According to Padhee, the Ratna Bhandar repairs included the replacement of 520 large granite stones, reinforcement with nine stainless steel beams inside and six beams outside, and structural consolidation to ensure long-term stability. The project was completed in 95 days, with over 333 hours of expert work.
Final touches, such as interior illumination and aesthetic enhancements, are still pending. However, the intended celebratory tone of the post was eclipsed by the ensuing controversy over the photographic content.
As of now, it remains unclear under what provisions the ASI photographed and shared visuals from restricted zones without prior clearance.
Further, neither the ASI nor the Ministry of Culture has issued an official statement confirming whether an internal inquiry will be launched.
