No question of PMO being asked to approve deal
"There is no question of Prime Minister`s Office being asked to approve the deal. It never came to that level," Singh said.
He was intervening during Question Hour in Rajya Sabha when Opposition members sought to know who in the PMO was responsible for approving the deal between Devas Multimedia Pvt Ltd (the Indian arm of Forge Advisors of US) and Antrix Corp, the commercial arm of ISRO.
Antrix, he said, is a commercial arm of ISRO and in normal course its deal with Devas does not go to the government for approval.
Only the launch of satellite "did come to the Cabinet," he said. But the Devas-Antrix deal "was not mentioned in the Cabinet note."
Minister of State in the Prime Minister`s Office V Narayanasamy said Antrix Corp Ltd, set up by Department of Space in 1992, had signed an agreement with Devas in January 2005 for leasing part of the space segment capacity in S-band on two geostationary satellites.
The agreement details the terms and conditions under which part of the transponder capacity of these satellites will be made available to Devas for 12 years.
This was as per the Satellite Communications Policy Framework for India approved by Cabinet in June 1997 which authorised INSAT capacity to be leased to non-governmental parties.
The norms, guidelines and procedures for implementation of this policy was approved by Cabinet in January 2000.
"These provided for entering into bilateral agreements with other agencies for marketing this capacity," he said.
He said in order to catalyse Digital Multimedia Services in India for which ground segment technology was evolving then in a very few developed countries, Antrix signed a MoU with Forge Advisors of USA in July 2003.
Subsequently, Forge promoted an Indian company called Devas with whom the Antrix entered into the agreement in January 2005 for lease of S-band transponder capacity in two satellites.
He said the allocation of S-band spectrum was pointed out in December 2009. The Space Commission annulled the agreement when it was felt that S-Band was required for defence, paramilitary forces and societal purposes. Subsequently, the Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) too annulled the deal.