Recommended Stories
“The Supreme court has order to maintain status quo on land acquisition and has also accepted the special leave petition (SLP) of the state government,” Vedanta Foundation lawyer Biswabihari Mohanty said.
The high court had also directed Vedanta to return the land to its various owners. Appearing for one of over half a dozen petitioners against the project, counsel Prashant Bhushan contended that the state government began acquiring land for setting up of a world class university by a group, which does not have the experience of establishing even a primary school. He also contended that Land Acquisition Company Rules, 1963, had not been properly followed by the state government. The high court had given its verdict on two public interest lawsuits and six individual petitions, challenging the state government`s notification on the land acquisition procedures. Another petitioner opposing the project contended that the proposed multi-disciplinary university project would cause extreme debilitating impact on the eco system as well as the local bio-diversity. Yet another petitioner, who is opposing the project is Vedanta University Sangharsh Samiti convener Umaballav Rath. He had earlier filed a PIL in the high court challenging the varsity project on the ground that it was envisaged on 500 acres of the temple land.“The apex court has order to maintain status quo. This order is victory of Lord Jagannath and the people of Orissa,” Vedanta University Sangharsh Samiti convener Umaballav Rath said.