Cash-at-judge’s door scam: SC no to quash Nirmal’s trial
A bench of justices H L Dattu and C K Prasad, however, allowed Yadav to raise all her objections before the trial court and asked the lower court to decide the case against her without being influenced by the High Court’s verdict allowing her criminal prosecution.
Senior advocate K T S Tulsi, appearing for the former judge, said she was not provided with the material on the basis of which the High Court had decided the case against her.
Yadav has moved the apex court challenging the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s order dismissing her plea contesting grant of sanction for her prosecution in the case.
In her petition in the High Court, Yadav had sought quashing of the charge sheet filed by CBI against her alleging that Chief Justice S H Kapadia had no power to recommend sanction to prosecute her as it was denied by the previous CJI K G Balakrishnan.
The High Court, while dismissing her plea on November 14 last year, had said that former CJI Balakrishnan had not passed any order declining the prosecution sanction and records confirmed that Justice Kapadia had examined the question of sanction against her for the first time.
The Punjab and Haryana High Court was rocked by the controversy after a sum of Rs 15 lakh was delivered at the residence of Justice Nirmaljit Kaur, another judge of the High Court, on August 13, 2008, following which she reported the matter to Chandigarh Police.
The money, allegedly meant for Yadav, was said to have been delivered to Kaur due to confusion over their names.
Yadav in her plea has denied the allegation that the money was meant for her.